SC suspends transfer of Lahore police chief Ghulam Mahmood Dogar

The orders were issued by a three-member bench comprising Justice Ijazul Ahsan, Justice Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi and Justice Munib Akhtar.

Dogar, as the Lahore CCPO was at the centre of a tussle between the federal government and the then-Punjab government under Chaudhry Parvez Elahi last year. Dogar booked PML-N leaders in cases and headed the Wazirabad JIT which was probing the attempted assassination of Imran Khan. The Centre tried recalling him, which was blocked by the Punjab government. It ultimately suspended Dogar, but he was reinstated by the top court. He was eventually transferred by the caretaker government.

In the previous hearing, the apex court had summoned CEC Raja Sikandar Sultan and grilled him regarding the “rush” in transferring Dogar. It had also urged Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial to initiate suo motu proceedings over the delay in the announcement of the election date for polls in Punjab within the stipulated period.

The hearing

As the hearing began today, Justice Ahsan asked if the CEC was in court to which the ECP secretary said that Raja couldn’t attend the proceedings as he was unwell.

Resuming his arguments, the ECP secretary said that the Punjab government had sent the first verbal request for Dogar’s transfer on January 23, 2023.

Here, Justice Ahsan noted that as per the rules, the electoral body could grant permission for transfers in critical circumstances.

Meanwhile, Justice Naqvi asked: “Can the election commission allow transfer and posting under normal circumstances?”

At one point during the hearing, Justice Akhtar asked the ECP secretary and DG Law to explain how a transfer could be made on a verbal request. “Who has given the chief election commissioner the right to approve postings on verbal requests?

“If a Mr X calls and makes such a request, will the court allow it?” he asked. “Under what laws were assistant commissioners transferred at the request of a caretaker government?”

Justice Akhtar also observed that the ECP and not the CEC had the right to approve postings and transfers. “Is this a tradition [in the ECP] to approve transfers on verbal requests?”

Here, the ECP secretary said that such transfers had taken place in the electoral body earlier as well. “After a verbal request, a written request was also made.”

However, Justice Akhtar interjected that the written request in Dogar’s case was sent after the police officer was transferred.

At this, the ECP secretary explained that the written request was sent to ECP on Jan 24 and Dogar was transferred on Feb 6.

“Are decisions taken on verbal requests in normal circumstances too?” Justice Akhtar asked. “Can constitutional institutions issue verbal orders?”

Justice Ahsan also noted that a request came, it was approved and even implemented. “The correspondence was done after execution,” he said.

Justice Akhtar then asked if the ECP had devolved all its power to the CEC to which the ECP’s DG Law said that no such documents regarding this were present.

Subsequently, the court suspended Dogar’s transfer orders and sent the case to a five-member SC bench hearing a case, namely ‘Political Interference in Punjab Police Transfer and Posting’.